| It’s hard to tell after just one episode, and I never read the novel. I do recommend watching the original. The emotions of each scene are more realized in the 1979 series, and the characterization is better for it. Specifically looking at the character of Marilla, even just in this first episode I can feel a difference in how her development is going. |
   Did you hear me? I said I'm gonna do my best!! ☆ |
| Nothing will ever compare to the old Katahata adaptation |
| Much worse, but because Isao Takahata was able to transmit the message in a majestic way. This anime doesnt have someone as skilled as him behind the scenes. You can see it in for example the pace, this adaptation kills most of Anne's dialogues which made her interesting enough for Matthew and Marilla to keep her, she didnt need to look pity and miserable like the direction make it look like here. Another downgrade is the atmosphere, here although the colors are pretty its style is pretty generic like you are not in the 1800s Canada. I'd recommend more the 79s since this one is pretty half-cooked. |
 |
Reply to Stars_align1
There’s a difference between the two anime adaptations. The original adaptation felt much more detailed and attentive. Its slower pace allowed for a deeper exploration of Anne’s character and the world around her. If you're truly interested in understanding Anne as a person and seeing the world through her eyes, the original anime is likely the better choice.
In contrast, the newer adaptation moves at a much faster pace. For example, what took five episodes to cover in the original was condensed into just the first episode of the new version. While there are a few new scenes that add depth to Anne’s character, they don't significantly alter the outcome of the story.
That said, Anne of Green Gables has seen many adaptations over the years. A few changes here and there are understandable—as long as the core story remains intact. It’s perfectly fine to adapt things a bit differently. The newer version seems to place more emphasis on the animation, and I think that’s a valid creative choice as well.
In contrast, the newer adaptation moves at a much faster pace. For example, what took five episodes to cover in the original was condensed into just the first episode of the new version. While there are a few new scenes that add depth to Anne’s character, they don't significantly alter the outcome of the story.
That said, Anne of Green Gables has seen many adaptations over the years. A few changes here and there are understandable—as long as the core story remains intact. It’s perfectly fine to adapt things a bit differently. The newer version seems to place more emphasis on the animation, and I think that’s a valid creative choice as well.
| @Stars_align1 First post since you were registered 3 years ago, wow. |
Reply to Turn_A_Blum
Much worse, but because Isao Takahata was able to transmit the message in a majestic way. This anime doesnt have someone as skilled as him behind the scenes. You can see it in for example the pace, this adaptation kills most of Anne's dialogues which made her interesting enough for Matthew and Marilla to keep her, she didnt need to look pity and miserable like the direction make it look like here. Another downgrade is the atmosphere, here although the colors are pretty its style is pretty generic like you are not in the 1800s Canada. I'd recommend more the 79s since this one is pretty half-cooked.
Turn_A_Blum said: Much worse, but because Isao Takahata was able to transmit the message in a majestic way. This anime doesnt have someone as skilled as him behind the scenes. You can see it in for example the pace, this adaptation kills most of Anne's dialogues which made her interesting enough for Matthew and Marilla to keep her, she didnt need to look pity and miserable like the direction make it look like here. Another downgrade is the atmosphere, here although the colors are pretty its style is pretty generic like you are not in the 1800s Canada. I'd recommend more the 79s since this one is pretty half-cooked. ^Massively this. The '79 version destroys this soulless mess like no tomorrow. The pacing is atrocious, the visual presentation of Green Gables falls flat (which is not just a selling point, but also an important connecting link to Anne's whole character) and Anne is nothing more here than your average 546th random genki anime girl. |
Use your brain before using your keyboard!  |
Reply to Junchi
Turn_A_Blum said:
Much worse, but because Isao Takahata was able to transmit the message in a majestic way. This anime doesnt have someone as skilled as him behind the scenes. You can see it in for example the pace, this adaptation kills most of Anne's dialogues which made her interesting enough for Matthew and Marilla to keep her, she didnt need to look pity and miserable like the direction make it look like here. Another downgrade is the atmosphere, here although the colors are pretty its style is pretty generic like you are not in the 1800s Canada. I'd recommend more the 79s since this one is pretty half-cooked.
Much worse, but because Isao Takahata was able to transmit the message in a majestic way. This anime doesnt have someone as skilled as him behind the scenes. You can see it in for example the pace, this adaptation kills most of Anne's dialogues which made her interesting enough for Matthew and Marilla to keep her, she didnt need to look pity and miserable like the direction make it look like here. Another downgrade is the atmosphere, here although the colors are pretty its style is pretty generic like you are not in the 1800s Canada. I'd recommend more the 79s since this one is pretty half-cooked.
^Massively this.
The '79 version destroys this soulless mess like no tomorrow. The pacing is atrocious, the visual presentation of Green Gables falls flat (which is not just a selling point, but also an important connecting link to Anne's whole character) and Anne is nothing more here than your average 546th random genki anime girl.
| @Junchi They also changed Marilla who is more strait-laced and strict, she doesnt easily admit things like here. And Diana isnt the same too. This version sacrifice characterization to make story go faster. 😔 |
|
Reply to Junchi
Turn_A_Blum said:
Much worse, but because Isao Takahata was able to transmit the message in a majestic way. This anime doesnt have someone as skilled as him behind the scenes. You can see it in for example the pace, this adaptation kills most of Anne's dialogues which made her interesting enough for Matthew and Marilla to keep her, she didnt need to look pity and miserable like the direction make it look like here. Another downgrade is the atmosphere, here although the colors are pretty its style is pretty generic like you are not in the 1800s Canada. I'd recommend more the 79s since this one is pretty half-cooked.
Much worse, but because Isao Takahata was able to transmit the message in a majestic way. This anime doesnt have someone as skilled as him behind the scenes. You can see it in for example the pace, this adaptation kills most of Anne's dialogues which made her interesting enough for Matthew and Marilla to keep her, she didnt need to look pity and miserable like the direction make it look like here. Another downgrade is the atmosphere, here although the colors are pretty its style is pretty generic like you are not in the 1800s Canada. I'd recommend more the 79s since this one is pretty half-cooked.
^Massively this.
The '79 version destroys this soulless mess like no tomorrow. The pacing is atrocious, the visual presentation of Green Gables falls flat (which is not just a selling point, but also an important connecting link to Anne's whole character) and Anne is nothing more here than your average 546th random genki anime girl.
| @Junchi @Turn_A_Blum took it outta my mouth. I rewatched the first 10 mins of '79 and compared to the first 10 of THIS version. |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Anne Shirley Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )KANLen09 - Apr 5 |
118 |
by Violeton
»»
5 hours ago |
|
Poll: » Anne Shirley Episode 2 DiscussionIzanaSolos - Apr 12 |
48 |
by phantomfandom
»»
Yesterday, 3:18 AM |
|
» Has anyone else read the original book?UhOhSPAGET - Apr 12 |
20 |
by popa910
»»
Apr 14, 5:57 PM |
|
» Source of inspiration?RobertBobert - Apr 11 |
9 |
by RobertBobert
»»
Apr 13, 10:19 AM |
|
» HYPEEEEElorextreme - Nov 19, 2024 |
29 |
by utopia-
»»
Apr 8, 8:31 AM |